Cases 31 - 40 of 73
DOE v. TETI et al
as 1:2015mc01380
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
CATHERINE TETI, TOM FLAVIN, KAREN SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MORALEZ LOPEZ v. BEAU THAI SHAW, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
ESTEBAN MORALEZ LOPEZ
Defendant:
BEAU THAI SHAW, LLC and ASCHARA VIGSITTABOOT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
DOUGHERTY v. MCKEE et al
as 1:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
KEITH DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
MCKEE, MARSHA WALDRON, SCIRICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GUARDADO et al v. FATHI & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RENE GUARDADO , HECTOR ALEXANDER VASQUEZ , CESAR RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant:
FATHI & ASSOCIATES, INC., NC FIREHOUSE, LLC, 1251 4TH STREET, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
FITE et al v. BANKS et al
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ERIC FITE and ROBERT DARRYL REEVES
Defendant:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE BANKS, CARL BOONE, RALPH J. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
SHAW v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv02203
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. SHAW
Defendant:
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. and MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAW v. ONE WEST BANK, FSB et al
as 1:2013cv01526
Plaintiff:
GREG SHAW
Defendant:
ONE WEST BANK, FSB and MCCURDY AND CANDLER, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAW v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2013cv01174
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and EMMANUEL SMITH
Plaintiff:
SARA SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. KIRCHNER et al
as 1:2012cv01334
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE JONES
Defendant:
STEVE KIRCHNER, JOSEPH SOPATA, STEPHEN NAUGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
