Cases 41 - 50 of 1,229
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RAHMANI et al v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
MIR RAHMAN RAHMANI, HAJI AJMAL RAHMANI, OZEAN IMMOBILIEN PROJEKTENTWICKLUNG VERWALTUNGS-GMBH and others
Defendant:
JANET YELLEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, BRADLEY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
BRAXTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BRAXTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC v. LEE-CHIN
as 1:2023cv03821
Petitioner:
THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC and DOMINICAN REPUBLIC
Respondent:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LEE-CHIN
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
DOE v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03790
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ANTHONY J. BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Leopold Brandenburg, Sr. v. DOS
as 23-5295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Leopold Roman Brandenburg, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of State, Anthony J. Blinken
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03682
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DALCOLLO v. FLORES et al
as 1:2023cv03713
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO
Defendant:
RAMERO FLORES, MARY FLORES and ANTHONY WILLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
