Cases 41 - 50 of 3,649
Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5058
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Michael Evan Horowitz, Department of Health and Human Services and others
IN RE ELMER STEWART RHODES et al
as 1:2024mc00039
Not Yet Classified:
ELMER STEWART RHODES, III
Petitioner:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN RE ETHAN NORDEAN et al
as 1:2024mc00040
Not Yet Classified:
ETHAN NORDEAN
Petitioner:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
35 STATE STREET HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC v. GUZMAN et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
35 STATE STREET HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC and 35 STATE STREET HOTEL PARTNERS, LLC doing business as HOTEL CALIFORNIAN
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Craven Casper v. USA, et al
as 24-5051
Plaintiff:
Craven Casper
Defendant:
United States of America and Clerk of Court, United States District Court, District of Columbia
J-D. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
S. J-D., SEAN DEWITT and RANITA JAIN
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
