Cases 41 - 50 of 107
SMITH v. REECE et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
DEANELLE TACHA REECE, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RICHARDSON
Defendant:
TAMMY RICHARDSON, TAMMY WATSON, DEMARIOUS CHUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ASHLEY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00369
Plaintiff:
RICKY ASHLEY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, SUSAN WEBBER WRIGHT, BRIAN S. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Rice v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-5078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Rice, also known as Anthony Wright
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Eleanor Holmes Norton, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
SMITH v. SCALIA et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
ANTONIN SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Anthony Holme
as 13-3017
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Anthony L. Holmes
HOLMES et al v. MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
as 1:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HOLMES and THERANOS, INC.
Defendant:
MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Angelo Richardson v. Eleanor Norton
as 12-5405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Angelo Richardson
Defendant - Appellee:
Eleanor Holmes Norton, Delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives
RICHARDSON v. NORTON
as 1:2012cv01937
Defendant:
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON
Plaintiff:
ANGELO RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
LETOURNEAU v. BIDEN et. al.
as 1:2012cv01713
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH LETOURNEAU
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., THOMA, JAMES KENNETH CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
