Cases 41 - 50 of 51
ABDULLAH et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2005cv00023
Petitioner:
HANI SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH, YOSRA SALEH RASHID ABDULLAH, RAMI BIN SAAD AL-OTEIBI and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARACHA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv02022
Petitioner:
SAIFULLAH PARACHA, FARHAT PARACHA, ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Interested Party:
PRIVILEGE TEAM
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD HENRY RUMSFELD and JAY HOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ABDAH et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv01254
Petitioner:
MAHMOAD ABDAH AHMED, MAJID MAHMOUD AHMED, MAHMOAD ABDAH and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANAM et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv01194
Petitioner:
BISHER NASER ALI ALMARWALH, MASAAB OMAR AL-MADHWANI, ABDULKHALIQ AL-BAIDHANI and others
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR., MUSLIM ADVOCATES, DUE PROCESS SCHOLARS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GHEREBI v. BUSH et al
as 1:2004cv01164
Petitioner:
FALEN GHEREBI
Respondent:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH and DONALD H. RUMSFELD
Movant:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR. , ASSOCIATED PRESS , NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
St NY, et al v. Microsoft Corp
as 02-7155
Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of New York, ex rel, State of California, ex rel, State of Connecticut, ex rel and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, ex rel
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA Today, The Washington Post Company, Los Angeles Times and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Microsoft Corporation
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
The Software and Information Industry Association, The Computer and Communications Industry Association and Project to Promote Competition & Innovation in the Digital Age
Terminated Party:
Robert E. Litan, Robert Shapiro, Lawrence Chickering and others
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Not Yet Classified:
The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Terminated Party:
The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant - Appellant:
United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Washington Post Company, ABC, Inc., American Society of Newspaper Editors and others
AL ODAH, et al v. USA, et al
as 1:2002cv00828
Plaintiff:
KHALED A.F. AL ODAH, OMAR RAJAB AMIN, MOHAMMAD R.M.R. AMEEN and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, DONALD H. RUMSFELD and others
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATED PRESS, NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and USA TODAY
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES B. GITTINGS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Boehner, John A. v. McDermott, James A.
as 98-7156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John A. Boehner
Defendant - Appellee:
James A. McDermott
Intervenor For Appellant:
United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The Washington Post Company, New York Times Company, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
