Cases 41 - 50 of 79
MITCHELL v. HUGLER
as 1:2017cv00292
Petitioner:
TAMMY MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDWARD HUGLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
STEARNS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY STEARNS , JOHN STEARNS , KAREN HALL and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
DOSS v. U.S. PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv00093
Plaintiff:
ANGEL PASTOR DOSS
Defendant:
U.S. PROBATION OFFICE, KAREN K. CALDWEL, TANYA WALTON PRATT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
WITCHER v. VOLKSWAGEN A.G.
as 1:2015cv01618
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and VOLKSWAGEN A.G.
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WITCHER , TAMMY WITCHER and DONNA SLUCK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FREELAND et al
as 1:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TONYA R. FREELAND and TAMMY S. TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DE ALMEIDA v. FU et al
as 1:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
ILEANA OAK PIRES DE ALMEIDA
Defendant:
TAMMY FU , ELEANOR FISHER and FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARRY FISCHER LAW FIRM, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00116
Defendant:
BARRY FISCHER LAW FIRM, LLC, TURIST-CAMBIO VIAGENS E TURISMO LTDA, G. JAMES CLEAVER and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
SMITH BEY v. UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE et al
as 1:2014cv01219
Plaintiff:
TAMMIE SMITH BEY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY MORTGAGE, S. LEE PAKE and WILLIAM KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FANNING v. BELL et al
as 1:2013cv01937
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. FANNING
Defendant:
JAMES AUSTIN WAYNE BELL, TAMMY WAYNETTE BELL, SELENA MARIE WALL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
