Cases 51 - 60 of 5,431
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00703
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EMMANUEL AGBARA, INNOCENT OPARA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIVOV v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR SIVOV
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, JOHN GINKEL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MARSH v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Anthony Marsh II and ANTHONY MARSH, II
Not Yet Classified:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
Anthony Delborrell, JOHN BEWLEY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PAGE v. EVANS
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. PAGE
Defendant:
MONICA H. EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC and STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00644
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
