Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 286
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT v. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY et al
as 1:2020cv02173
Defendant: GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD, CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY, BESSEMER AND LAKE ERIE RAILROAD and others
Plaintiff: BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION/IBT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
City of Seattle, Washington, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1300
Petitioner: City of Concord, California, City of Napa, California, City of Richmond, California and others
Respondent: United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE et al v. DEVOS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01996
Plaintiff: KEISHA GUYTON, LISA MINGRONE, PASADENA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and ELISABETH D. DEVOS
Amicus Curiae: TEXAS CENTER FOR EDUCATIONPOLICY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS - AUSTIN, CENTER FOR LAW AND EDUCATION, ROUGHRIDER POLICY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Clean Fuels Development, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1230
Petitioner: South Dakota Farmers Union, Clean Fuels Development Coalition, Siouxland Ethanol, LLC and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and United States Department of Transportation
Burt Lake Band of Ottawa v. DOI, et al
as 20-5152
Defendant / Appellant: Tara Sweeney, In her official capacity as the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs for the Department of the Interior, United States Department of the Interior and David Longly Bernhardt, in his offcial capacity as the Secretary of the Department of the Interior
Plaintiff / Appellee: Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians
WINTHROP-UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al v. AZAR
as 1:2020cv01239
Plaintiff: MEMORIAL HERMANN TEXAS MEDICAL MEDICAL CENTER, MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, UH ELYRIA MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
MILLER v. NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2020cv01107
Respondent: NORTHERN DIST. OF ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, NORTH CHICAGO POLICE DEPT. and others
Petitioner: SHARIFF MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Center for Biological Div, et al v. Aurelia Skipwith, et al
as 20-5078
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: Forest Resources Association, Inc., Ohio Oil and Gas Association, National Association of Homebuilders of the United States and others
Defendant / Appellee: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and Aurelia Skipwith, in her official capacity as Director of US Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff / Appellee: Defenders of Wildlife, 16cv0910, Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Independent Petroleum Association of America
Gerald Hawkins, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-5074
Plaintiff / Appellant: Rascal Ranch, LLC, Troy Brooks, Franklin J. Melsness and others
Defendant / Appellee: David Longly Bernhardt, Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Mercier, Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs, Northwest Regional office, Tara Katuk Mac Lean Sweeney, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs and others
Center for Biological Diversi, et al v. Aurelia Skipwith, et al
as 20-5075
Plaintiff / Appellee: Defenders of Wildlife, 16cv0910, Sierra Club, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Petroleum Institute and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, David Longly Bernhardt, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and Aurelia Skipwith, in her official capacity as Director of US Fish and Wildlife Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?