Cases 51 - 60 of 78
RIVERA v. SARIS et al
as 1:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A. RIVERA
Defendant:
PATTI B. SARIS, WILLIAM B. CARR, JR., RICARDO H. HINOJOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA et al v. MESKI
as 1:2014cv01036
Defendant:
ERJON MESKI
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO RIVERA , HENNING GREIME, MICHAEL BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
WILSON v. RIVERA
as 1:2013cv01921
Plaintiff:
DERRICK WILSON
Defendant:
C.V. RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIVERA v. BOX 20, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01572
Plaintiff:
JOSE OSMIN RIVERA
Defendant:
BOX 20, INC., FABIO BEGGIATO and PATRICIA BEGGIATO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
AMAYA et al v. SCAFFOLD RESOURCE, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01156
Plaintiff:
NELSON JEFTE BARAHONA AMAYA , HERSON BARAHONA AMAYA , JACOB ORLANDO RIVERA and others
Defendant:
SCAFFOLD RESOURCE, LLC , NATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. and FIVE STARS BUILDERS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 Fair Labor Standards Act
RIVERA-NIEBLA v. USA
as 1:2013cv00744
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MANUEL RIVERA-NIEBLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MANNING et al v. McHUGH et al
as 1:2012cv01802
Plaintiff:
SHAWN NELSON MANNING , AUTUMN MANNING , AMANDA ASTORGA and others
Defendant:
JOHN McHUGH, LEON B. PANETTA, ROBERT MUELLER III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
PINTO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01699
Plaintiff:
NILS RAFAEL PINTO , MARTA RIVERA and K. P.R.
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
RIVERA v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv01056
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RIVERA
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and GREGORY BRITTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RIVERA v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2012cv00168
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO RIVERA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
