Cases 51 - 60 of 2,448
BOLDEN v. STATE OF ILLINOIS
as 1:2023cv02015
Plaintiff:
DONNELL T. BOLDEN
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABBOTT
as 1:2023cv01555
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES T ABBOTT and JAMES T. ABBOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BYRD v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
NOAH T. BYRD
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jose Vasquez v. DC, et al
as 23-7050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose T. Vasquez
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia and Ruben Agosto, Officer; Individually and in his capacity as an employee of the District of Columbia.
RAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. RAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF US ATTORNEYS, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01141
Petitioner:
ANTHONY T. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
