Cases 61 - 70 of 148
WATKINS v. LAWSKY et al
as 1:2016cv00088
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WATKINS
Defendant:
BENJAMIN LAWSKY and HAROLD D. GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
GRAHAM v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv01101
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLIAM BECHTOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv00565
Plaintiff:
JAMES BREWER , MARQUETTE FRAZIER and ARIK SIMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , WILLIAM SMITH, JONATHAN ARMSTEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Civil Rights
Barbara Lumpkins v. United States Government, et al
as 15-5093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara B. Lumpkins
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Government, Jay C. Zainey, personally, Susan E. Morgan, personally and others
HEARD et al v. UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
TINA HEARD , PEARLINE SNOW and CAROLYN GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
COBB v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
DONALD L. COBB
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, METRO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. MENSAH et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
F. MENSAH, D. LAWHORNE, STERN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. FCC COLEMAN USP II
as 1:2014cv01567
Petitioner:
DAVID GRAHAM, JR.
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRAHAM v. OTEY
as 1:2014cv01267
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE GRAHAM
Defendant:
MELVIN OTEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
