Cases 61 - 70 of 1,032
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
SCHMITT v. WORMUTH
as 1:2023cv01489
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J SCHMITT and ANDREW J. SCHMITT
Defendant:
CHRISTINE E. WORMUTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Andrew Hanson, et al v. DC, et al
as 23-7061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Hanson, Tyler Yzaguirre, Nathan Chaney and others
Defendant / Appellee:
District of Columbia, Robert J. Contee, III and Ashan M. Benedict
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Andrew Cox v. Merrick Garland
as 23-5108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Cox
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KHAN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
HAJIRA KHAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
BANKS et al v. US BANK TRUST ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
IRA R. BANKS and VERNA BANKS
Defendant:
US BANK TRUST ASSOCIATION, BEATRICE GARRETT, BEST CARE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
