Cases 61 - 70 of 112
HAMPTON V. COMEY, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv01607
Plaintiff:
JEROME HAMPTON
Defendant:
JAMES B. COMEY, ANNE MARY CARTER, TIMOTHY J. ERVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01610
Petitioner:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and LEANN LARIVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLETT v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv01496
Plaintiff:
DAWANE A. MALLETT
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., JENNIFER COULTER, PAUL ZOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01466
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv01333
Petitioner:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRELAND v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00988
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00911
Plaintiff:
ERIC LAMONT JOHNSON
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5108
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DANSER v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2014cv00867
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. DANSER
Defendant:
GEORGE E. SAMUELS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, RODNEY W. CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COFIELD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2014cv00746
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , INMATE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION SYSTEM , FPI-INMATE CLAIMS EXAMINERS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
