Cases 81 - 90 of 238
WATKINS LAW & ADVOCACY, PLLC v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2018cv00365
Plaintiff:
WATKINS LAW & ADVOCACY, PLLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv02855
Plaintiff:
LEONARDO RAMOS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv02649
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EDMOND v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv02611
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDMOND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
EDMOND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv02243
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDMOND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose Duru v. DOJ, et al
as 17-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rose Adanma Duru
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Karen Mitchell, U.S. District Court Clerk for the Northern District of Texas and others
PEJOUHESH v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
HASSAN ALI PEJOUHESH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PROPERTY OF THE PEOPLE, INC. et al v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv01663
Plaintiff:
PROPERTY OF THE PEOPLE, INC. and RYAN NOAH SHAPIRO
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
PEJOUHESH v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2017cv01684
Plaintiff:
HASSAN ALI PEJOUHESH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DURU v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv01547
Defendant:
ERIC BRENNEN, SOUTHEAST PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, MARK S. ZEMELMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
