Cases 1 - 10 of 42
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
SIBLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv00600
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY, BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Plaintiff:
LOWELL SIBLEY, SUZI FERNANDEZ, JORDAN SIBLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HUBBARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
LISA HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON, SR et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2019cv03003
Plaintiff:
LANDYN ANDREWS, TERRENCE PURNELL, MALISA SANTORO and others
Defendant:
MOHAMMD JAVAD ZARIF and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Not Yet Classified:
Daniel Kincheloe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUBBARD v. GIPSON
as 1:2019cv02140
Defendant:
CONNIE GIPSON
Plaintiff:
ZANE HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUBBARD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01411
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
LORA ELAINE HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Joshua Hubbard
as 19-3014
Defendant / Appellant:
Joshua Hubbard
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
WASAKA v. HUBBARD
as 1:2018cv01492
Plaintiff:
ITANCAN WASAKA
Defendant:
RONDA HUBBARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
