Cases 1 - 6 of 6
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROBINSON v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2007cv02145
Plaintiff:
JULIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, KAREN TANDY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 1:2007cv01707
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, ALAN R. SWENDIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
INDYMAC BANK, F.S.B. et al v. IRVING, et al.
as 1:2007cv01678
Defendant:
SOUTHSHORE TITLE & ESCROW, INC. , TIMOTHY F. GEPPERT , FAIRFAX REALTY, INC. and others
Receiver:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cross_claimant:
WILLIAM C. HARVEY & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cross_defendant:
LEGACY FINANCIAL CORPORATION and SAMUEL ADEBAYO
Plaintiff:
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 1:2007cv01577
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, ALAN R. SENDIMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
