Cases 1 - 10 of 26
USA v. Charles Littlejohn
as 24-3019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charles Edward Littlejohn
UMBERT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01336
Plaintiff:
Chase W. Bickel, Erroll Alexander Eaton, Gary James Lecomte and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JEFFERSON SESSIONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv00957
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD CURRY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ROBERT JUNELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTIS v. HARRIS TEETER, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00405
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD ARTIS
Defendant:
HARRIS TEETER, INC., DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Fields v. Scott Harris
as 15-5276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Fields
Defendant - Appellee:
Scott S. Harris
FIELDS v. HARRIS
as 1:2015cv00560
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD FIELDS
Defendant:
SCOTT S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS V. SOUTH CAROLINA, ET AL.
as 1:2014cv00873
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, MEDICAL DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00842
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD THOMAS
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT and PRISON DIRECTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Davis v. United States Sentencing Comm
as 14-5109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brian Davis
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Charles Edward Mcintyre
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Sentencing Commission
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2012cv01825
Plaintiff:
AUDREY CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
