Cases 1 - 10 of 437
GALLO et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2024cv01746
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER GALLO, GAVIN CLARKE and DESHAUN PROCTOR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
SADIQ v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01693
Plaintiff:
REHAN SADIQ
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, THATCHER SCHARPF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
TACCINO et al v. WREN et al
as 1:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A. TACCINO and CAROL J. TACCINO
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WREN, MERRICK GARLAND, CHRISTIE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BILLINGS CLINIC et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
BILLINGS CLINIC, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL doing business as BEAUMONT HEALTH - FARMINGTON HILLS, CAMDEN-CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL doing business as CAMDEN CLARK MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
OLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CLARK OLD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Deafueh Monbo, et al v. Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., et al
as 24-7070
Plaintiff:
Deafueh Monbo and Juahdi Monbo
Defendant:
Upper Chesapeake Medical Center, Inc., Harford Memorial Hospital, Inc., Eskinder Afework, individually and as an employee of Upper Chesapeake Medical Center Inc. and others
Employees' Retirement Plan Of The National Edu, et al v. Clark County Education Association
as 24-7067
Plaintiff:
Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association and Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement Plan of the National Education Association of the United States
Defendant:
Clark County Education Association
CLARKE v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. CLARKE, III
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
