Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff: AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
COMBS v. MARTIN
as 1:2024cv00680
Plaintiff: Celeste M Combs and CELESTE M. COMBS
Defendant: Kevin A Martin and KEVIN A. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
HOOLI v. COMBS et al
as 1:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: BASAVARAJ HOOLI
Defendant: TODD COMBS and LARRY MITCHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMES-IRVIN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv01961
Plaintiff: KEITA M JAMES-IRVIN and KEITA M. JAMES-IRVIN
Defendant: 1017 Records, STACY ABRAMS, ASCAP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01690
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
ADESHINA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2022cv00906
Plaintiff: YINKA ADESHINA
Defendant: GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL J. CLINTON, ELON MUSK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRAKE v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2021cv00801
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA, TOBB COMBS, GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: ERIC V. DRAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MURPHY v. SNEDECKER et al
as 1:2019cv03840
Defendant: NANCY COMB DICKENSON, ELISEBETH STOKES, JOHN BROWN LEE and others
Plaintiff: DAMIAN ANTONIO MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIREARMS POLICY FOUNDATION et al v. US DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2019cv03184
Plaintiff: BRANDON COMBS, FIREARMS POLICY FOUNDATION and FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC.
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01614
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?