Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BLAIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN BLAIR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEVIN PERALTA, CLAUDY TOUSSAINT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY FABIAN NAGEL
as 1:2022mc00071
In Re:
REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY FABIAN NAGEL
HORTON v. ESPINDOLA et al
as 1:2017cv01230
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. HORTON
Defendant:
FABIAN ESPINDOLA, MAJOR LEAGUE SOCCER, LLC , BENJAMIN OLSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
ITSEKIRI NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE WASHINGTON - BALTIMORE CONSOLIDATED METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA INCORPORATED et al v. UGBAJO ITSEKIRI USA INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01777
Plaintiff:
ITSEKIRI NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THE WASHINGTON - BALTIMORE CONSOLIDATED METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA INCORPORATED and BIBIANA ANYANWU
Defendant:
UGBAJO ITSEKIRI USA INC., FABIAN ORTSEBEMINGHO IWERE and ELLIS TOJU BUWA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TINSLEY v. CLERK OF COURT
as 1:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
FABIAN TINSLEY
Defendant:
CLERK OF COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAIL LOPEZ et al v. TIMECO, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv01040
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO GENARO VAIL LOPEZ , TAGESSE DUKO , IDILU AYANA and others
Defendant:
TIMECO, INC. and HOUSHANG MOMENIAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01899
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
HARVEY v. EMERSON
as 1:2012cv00300
Petitioner:
FERDELL FABIAN HARVEY
Respondent:
WELMER EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ et al v. KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY et al
as 1:2011cv02038
Plaintiff:
FABIAN GONZALEZ-GONZALEZ and KARINA N. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY, EDWARD TURNER, FREDDIE MAC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
