Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GAGE v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al
as 1:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, SHAWN M. LATOURETTE, CHRISTOPHER SQUAZZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BUSHNELL et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv00646
Plaintiff:
PRUDENCE BUSHNELL, RICHARD BUCKLEY, SUSAN BUSHNELL and others
Defendant:
THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
BECK v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03659
Plaintiff:
BECK
Defendant:
WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, JOHN G. ROBERTS, RICHARD H. KYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01000
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
PAMELA MACDONALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOVA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. BOVA , RICHIE BAKER , CORA FRYE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WHITLEY v. FANNIE MAE et al
as 1:2012cv00453
Plaintiff:
CHARLESTON EARL WHITLEY
Defendant:
FANNIE MAE, WILLS ESTATE INHERITANCE, CONTINENTIAL HOTEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ-JIMENEZ v. DC/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01654
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL DANIEL DE LA CRUZ-JIMENEZ
Defendant:
DC/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RONNIE HOLT, CAMERON LINDSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
