Cases 1 - 10 of 32
MURPHY v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv01441
Defendant:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, BANK OF AMERICA, MERS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK H. MURPHY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
WATSON v. FARIS et al
as 1:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
RONALD EUGENE WATSON
Defendant:
MARK H. WITTSTADT, ERIC VANDEL LINDE, MICHAEL KOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LANCASTER v. FOX, JR. et al
as 1:2014cv01051
Plaintiff:
JUNIUS LANCASTER
Defendant:
BEVERLY A. FOX, JR., HSBC BANK USA, INC. , MARK H. WITTSTADT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JAWAD v. HAGEL et al
as 1:2014cv00811
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED JAWAD
Defendant:
CHUCK HAGEL, ROBERT M. GATES, DONALD H. RUMSFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Abdul Rahim Janko v. Robert M. Gates, et al
as 12-5017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak Al Janko
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert M. Gates, Former Secretary of Defense, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Fmr. Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz, Fmr. Deputy Secretary of Defense and others
JENKO v. GATES et al
as 1:2010cv01702
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RAHIM ABDUL RAZAK AL JENKO
Defendant:
ROBERT M. GATES, DONALD RUMSFELD, PAUL WOLFOWITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SCOTT v. EATON
as 1:2009cv00949
Plaintiff:
MARK H. SCOTT
Defendant:
RALPH EATON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KHAIRKHWA et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01805
Petitioner:
KHAIRULLA KHAIRKHWA and SAMI AL HAJJ
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, ROBERT M. GATES, MARK H. BUZBY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
