Cases 1 - 10 of 203
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Andrew-Bey v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5069
Petitioner:
Robert Andrew-Bey
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland and Muriel Bowser
HAFEZ v. VIDINO et al
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
FARID HAFEZ
Defendant:
LORENZO VIDINO, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, PROGRAM FOR EXTREMISM AT THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
NADA et al v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
HAZIM NADA and LORD ENERGY SA
Defendant:
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, ARIAF STUDIES AND RESEARCH LLC, ABU DHABI NATIONAL OIL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00205
Not Yet Classified:
HAZIM NADA, LORD ENERGY SA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES and others
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brud Rossmann v. Linda Sapin, et al
as 24-5009
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossmann, Esquire
Defendant:
Linda Sapin, Ph.D, Philip Pulaski, MD, John Maxwell Finland and others
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HYLTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03732
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
