Cases 11 - 20 of 517
Anderson v. US
as 23-2224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY M. ANDERSON, PAUL L. BAILEY, RONALD L. BLASH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Allen v. US
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE E. ALLEN, JOSEPH E. ARMSTEAD, LAWRENCE C. BECKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Beavis v. US
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. BEAVIS, EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, ALAN G. CHESTERMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Arrendondolopez v. DVA
as 23-2351
Petitioner:
JUAN WILLIAM ARRENDONDOLOPEZ
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Williams Building Company, Inc. v. Secretary of State
as 23-2337
Appellant:
WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC.
Appellee:
SECRETARY OF STATE
Goode v. Cook
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Rogers v. HHS
as 23-2176
Petitioner / Appellant:
BERNADETTE ROGERS, as legal representative for Willie Lee Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Alonso v. Quan
as 23-2169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM QUAN, POLI FLORES, (NFN) ROSS and others
King v. US
as 23-1956
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM KING, ANTHONY GUGLIUZZA and STEPHEN DARDZINSKI, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Greene v. US
as 23-1954
Plaintiff:
TONY LAMONTE GREENE, ANTHONY MICHAEL JACKSON, WILLIAM GEORGE COODEY, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BILLIE WAYNE BYRD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
