Cases 11 - 20 of 127
COAKLEY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE DOUGLAS COAKLEY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ATS Ford Drive Investment, LLC v. US
as 23-1760
Plaintiff:
ATS FORD DRIVE INVESTMENT, LLC, ALEXANDER AUTO AND RADIATOR REPAIR, RONALD MORRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GODBY PROPERTIES, LP, REZIN FAMILY INVESTMENTS LLS, Greenstone Asset Management, c/o, BRIAN L. SCHOONVELD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
LAMBERT et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00523
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LAMBERT and JEAN LAMBERT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DOUGLAS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00472
Petitioner:
YVETTE DOUGLAS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Douglas v. McDonough
as 23-1600
Claimant:
WILLIS L. DOUGLAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
VAN DEUSEN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA VAN DEUSEN, DOUGLAS BROWN, JANET BROWN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Smith v. McDonough
as 22-2213
Claimant:
GREGORY DOUGLAS SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
City of Fresno v. US
as 22-1994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF FRESNO, ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, CHOWCHILLA WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
PIERCE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00743
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS PIERCE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
