Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 69
LidoChem, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff: LidoChem, Inc.
Defendant: United States, et al., United States, United States Trade Representative and others
RAYA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00385
Petitioner: AL RAYA
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Dogwatch, Inc. et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff: Dougwatch, Inc., et al, Dogwatch, Inc., AutoCell Electronics, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States, et al., United States, United States Trade Representative and others
Evans v. DHS
as 23-1549
Petitioner: AL J. EVANS, JR.
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
ZT Group Int'l Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff: ZT Group Int'l Inc. and United States, et al.
Defendant: United States, Office of the United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
AL-HIYARI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00183
Petitioner: AIMAN AL-HIYARI
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Renfro, LLC et al v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00006
Plaintiff: Renfro, LLC, et al., Renfro, LLC and Sea Box, Inc.
Defendant: United States, et al., United States, United States Trade Representative and others
Bexar County v. Martin
as 22-2211
Plaintiff / Appellee: BEXAR COUNTY, et al.
Defendant / Appellant: ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR., as Administrator and Individually as Heir to the Estate of Johnnie Mae King
Bravenec v. Martin
as 22-2191
Plaintiff / Appellee: EDWARD BRAVENEC, et al.
Defendant / Appellant: ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR.
Neo G USA Inc. et al v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff: Neo G USA, et al., Libbey Glass LLC, Syracuse China LLC and others
Defendant: United States, et al, United States, United States Trade Representative and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?