Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 504
Purem Novi Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv00028
Plaintiff: Purem Novi Inc. F/K/A Eberspaecher Group Exhaust Technology Division, Purem Novi Inc. and Eberspaecher Group Exhaust Technology Div.
Defendant: United States, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Trade Representative
POMEROY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00104
Petitioner: DUANE F. POMEROY
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROWELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01879
Petitioner: SEAN F. ROWELL, II
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Midyett v. DVA
as 23-1268
Petitioner: F. ALLAN MIDYETT
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Finn v. State of New York
as 23-1108
Plaintiff / Appellant: GEORGE H. FINN and GEORGE HENRY FINN, II
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NEW YORK, HINMAN HOWARD & KATTELL, LLC, KATHERINE A. FITZGERALD and others
Brooks v. McDonough
as 23-1062
Claimant: JOHN F. BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited et al v. United States
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff: Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited and Double F Limited
Defendant: United States
Gomez v. Interior
as 22-2024
Petitioner: NELSON F. GOMEZ
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant: In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
HARRELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00635
Petitioner: JACQUESE F. HARRELL
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?