Cases 51 - 60 of 794
HORN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01144
Petitioner:
DAVID HORN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
THACKER v. USA
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
DAVID KENT THACKER, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BROWN v. US
as 1:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
DAVID EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Goode v. Cook
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Murphy v. OPM
as 23-2019
Petitioner:
DAVID L. MURPHY and KAREN DAHLSTROM
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
ALMEIDA et al
as 1:2023cv00867
Plaintiff:
TRACY ALMEIDA, BONETTE ASHCROFT, KEHINDE ASHCROFT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
