Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Carucel Investments L.P. v. Vidal
as 21-1731
Appellant:
CARUCEL INVESTMENTS L.P.
Appellee:
VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. and UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
Intervenor:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Perry v. PTO
as 23-1812
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Defendant:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, WENDY GARBER, Director Patent Technology Center, DARNELL JAYNE, Director and others
Incept LLC v. Palette Life Sciences, Inc.
as 21-2063
Appellee:
PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
Appellant:
INCEPT LLC
Intervenor:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Goode v. Cook
as 23-2023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON GOODE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities, SCOTT SEMPLE, Commissioner, Connecticut Department of Correction, Retired, in his individual capacity, WILLIAM JOSEPH MURPHY, Director, Programs and Treatment Division, Connecticut Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Lomax v. Mayor of the City of Miami
as 23-1982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTIE TWYNETTE LOMAX, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, CITY OF MIAMI POLICE DEPARTMENT, JORGE LOO and others
Mascorro v. San Diego County, CA
as 23-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELOY MASCORRO
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CA, THE SAN DIEGO SHERRIF'S DEPARTMENT, SAN DIEGO SHERIFF and others
Hyatt v. PTO
as 21-2324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREI IANCU, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Hyatt v. PTO
as 21-1708
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GILBERT P. HYATT
In re: Universal Electronics, Inc.
as 22-1782
Appellant:
In re: UNIVERSAL ELECTRONICS, INC.
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
In re: Miller
as 21-1599
Appellant:
In re: TONIA WALSTAD MILLER
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Acting Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
