Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Upstream Holdings, LLC v. Brekunitch
as 24-1924
Plaintiff: UPSTREAM HOLDINGS, LLC
Counter Defendant: MIDWAY METALS LLC, CONTRACTOR METALS, LLC, ERIC BACHMAN and others
Defendant: M AND M MACHINERY, DOES, 1-7, MARTIN LOPEZ, SR. and others
Chinook Landing, LLC v. US
as 24-1884
Plaintiff: CHINOOK LANDING, LLC, as personal representative of the Estate of John Lund
Defendant: UNITED STATES and JOHN DOES, 1-15
Dynamite Marketing, Inc. v. The WowLine, Inc.
as 24-1525
Plaintiff: DYNAMITE MARKETING, INC.
Defendant: THE WOWLINE, INC., SHERMAN SPECIALTY LLC, SHERMAN SPECIALTY, INC and others
Dynamite Marketing, Inc. v. The WowLine, Inc.
as 24-1523
Plaintiff: DYNAMITE MARKETING, INC.
Defendant: THE WOWLINE, INC., SHERMAN SPECIALTY LLC, SHERMAN SPECIALTY, INC and others
WHITLOCK v. USA
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE and JOSEPH E. WHITLOCK
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DOE NO. 1 v. USA
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff: DOE NO. 1
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Sherman v. U.S. District Court Eastern District of Arkansas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1946
Plaintiff / Appellant: PATRICK LONNELL SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS and DOES
DOE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00692
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Perry v. PTO
as 23-1812
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. PERRY
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Defendant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, WENDY GARBER, Director Patent Technology Center, DARNELL JAYNE, Director and others
Doe No. 1 v. US
as 23-1653
Plaintiff / Appellee: DOE NO. 1
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?