Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 90
KIM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01069
Petitioner: GIORGIANA ANGELICA KIM
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Kim v. US
as 26-2010
Plaintiff: TONGSUN KIM and GWANJUN KIM
Defendant: UNITED STATES
HovgaardIn re: Hovgaard
as 26-145
Petitioner: In re: KIM ANTHONY HOVGAARD
Respondent: DOUGLAS A. COLLINS, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
KIM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00762
Petitioner: BILLIE KIM
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STEWART v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00656
Petitioner: KIM STEWART
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Kamdem-Ouaffo v. Colgate Palmolive Co.
as 26-1726
Plaintiff: RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO, trading as Kamdem Group
Defendant: COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO., HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC, NATURASOURCE INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
KIM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00481
Petitioner: MOLLY KIM
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Jackler v. DOJ
as 26-1575
Petitioner: MEGAN JACKLER and BRANDON JAROCH
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Amicus Curiae: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTIONS BOARD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, SENATOR ANGELA ALSOBROOKS, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES and others
Insulet Corp. v. EOFlow, Co. Ltd.
as 26-1506
Plaintiff: INSULET CORP.
Defendant: EOFLOW, CO. LTD., EOFLOW, INC. and JESSE J. KIM
FOSTER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv00354
Petitioner: KIM FOSTER
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?