Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Q Technologies, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.
as 24-1667
Plaintiff:
Q TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
WALMART, INC.
HAMIL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY Q. HAMIL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. US
as 24-1258
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINYI CHENGEN IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., CELTIC CO., LTD., JIAXING GSUN IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
COALITION FOR FAIR TRADE OF HARDWOOD PLYWOOD
Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. US
as 24-1259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINYI CHENGEN IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., CELTIC CO., LTD., JIAXING GSUN IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
COALITION FOR FAIR TRADE OF HARDWOOD PLYWOOD
WILSON et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
GERALD WILSON, MARSHERRIA WILSON, THOMAS W. JACOBS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Hanwha Solutions Corp. v. REC Solar Pte. Ltd.
as 23-1516
Appellant:
HANWHA SOLUTIONS CORP. and HANWHA Q CELLS USA INC.
Appellee:
REC SOLAR PTE. LTD.
REC Solar Pte. Ltd. v. Hanwha Solutions Corp.
as 23-1508
Appellant:
REC SOLAR PTE. LTD.
Appellee:
HANWHA SOLUTIONS CORP. and HANWHA Q CELLS USA INC.
Roberts v. Studio 15 Management
as 23-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
STUDIO 15 MANAGEMENT, RUTH RIVERIA and JOVANNA Q.
Hanwha Q CELLS America Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Hanwha Q CELLS America Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection and CBP Commissioner Christopher Magnus
Arunachalam v. International Business Machines Corporation
as 22-2121
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., SAP AMERICA, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
