Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Jericho Group Ltd v. Mid-Town Development Limited P
as 19-2894
Defendant: Elaine O. Emmet, Harwood Lloyd LLC, Lisa Solomon and others
Defendant / Appellee: Mid-Town Development Limited Partnership, John Doe 1-10, Arthur E. Imperatore and others
Plaintiff: Jericho Co.
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jericho Group Ltd
Appellant: Samuel Pfeiffer
Izzo Golf v. King Par Corporation
as 19-2935
Defendant: XYZ Corporation 1-10, B & P Baird Holdings, Inc., KP Acquisition Company and others
Defendant / Appellant: William J. Baird
Plaintiff / Appellee: Izzo Golf, FKA Dancorp Investors, Inc.
Murphy v. LaJaunie
as 19-2872
Plaintiff: Srebrina Balova, Alexander Harper, Eleno Ocotoxtle and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Stephanie Castillo, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Nicole Clouse, on behalf of themselves and others similiarly situated, Efrain Ramirez and others
Defendant / Appellee: Philippe LaJaunie
Defendant: La Boucherie Inc., LHLM Group, Corporation, AKA Brasserie Les Halles New York, XYZ Corporation 1-10 and others
Murphy v. LaJaunie
as 19-2705
Plaintiff / Appellee: Lucero Palemon, on behalf of themselves and others similiarly situated, Alan Urbina, John Paul Crucianelli and others
Defendant: La Boucherie Inc., LHLM Group, Corporation, AKA Brasserie Les Halles New York, XYZ Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellant: Philippe LaJaunie
Jericho Group Ltd v. Mid-Town Development Limited P
as 18-2009
Plaintiff: Jericho Co.
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jericho Group Ltd
Appellant: Samuel Pfeiffer
Defendant - Appellee: Mid-Town Development Limited Partnership, Edward G. Imperatore, Maurice L. Stone and others
Defendant: George Berger, Jeffrey Shore, Philips Nizer LLP and others
Ronnie Van Zant, Inc. v. Artimus Pyle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2849
Plaintiff: ABC
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ronnie Van Zant, Inc., Gary R. Rossington, Johnny Van Zant and others
Defendant: DEF, Artimus Pyle, AKA Thomas D. Pyle, John Doe and others
Defendant - Appellant: Cleopatra Records, Inc and Cleopatra Films, a division of Cleopatra Records, Inc
Esposito v. Golden
as 17-718
Plaintiff - Appellant: Darlene Esposito
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Chasan Lamparello Mallon & Cappuzzo, PC
Defendant: Jay Golden, New York State Division of Human Rights, HUD FHEO N.Y. Division, Breslin and Breslin, for Bergen County Housing Authority, Jane and John Does, 1-10, individually and as owners, officers, directors, shareholders, founders, managers, agents, servants, employees, represenatives and/or independent contractors of Hekemain LLC and Bergen County HA and XYZ Corporations and others
Murphy v. LaJaunie
as 16-3114
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ethan Murphy, Stephanie Castillo, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Christopher L. Scott, on behalf of themselves and others similiarly situated and others
Defendant: La Boucherie Inc., 15 John Corp., LHLM Group, Corporation, AKA Brasserie Les Halles New York and others
Defendant - Appellant: Philippe LaJaunie
United Torah Education v. Solomon Capital LLC
as 14-3454
Plaintiff - Appellant: United Torah Education & Scholarship Fund, Inc., A Florida non for profit corporation
Defendant: John Does, 1-100, fictitious persons and XYZ Corporations, 1-100, fictitious entities
Defendant - Appellee: Solomon Capital LLC, New York limited liability company, Solomon Capital 401(k) Trust, A New York qualified retirement trust, Solomon Sharbat, trustee, Solomon Capital Living Trust, A New York qualified retirement trust, Solomon Sharbat, trustee and others
Simmons v. Stanberry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3106
Plaintiff - Appellant: Tyrone Simmons
Defendant - Appellee: William C. Stanberry, Jr., AKA Apex, Curtis Jackson, AKA 50 cent, UMG Recordings, Inc. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?