Cases 21 - 30 of 77
Brown v. New York City Police Department
as 22-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Noel Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
NYPD P.O. Anthony Kempinski, Badge #26684, NYPD P.O. Kim Li, Badge #13537, City of New York and others
Defendant:
New York City Police Department, Fifth Precinct New York County, William Doyle and others
In Re: Timothy Doyle Young
as 22-706
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
United States, Department of Justice and United States Attorney General
Ellis v. Riquier
as 22-560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Ellis
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald Riquier, Correctional Officer at Broome County Jail, Jason Cackowski, Correctional Officer at Broome County Jail, Brian Doyle, FKA Correctional Officer Doyal and others
Defendant:
David Allen, Correctional Officer, Denny Rowe, Correctional Officer, Rick Bochardt, Hearing/Grievance Officer and others
In Re: Timothy Doyle Young
as 21-2840
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
United States, Department of Justice and United States Attorney General
In Re: Timothy Doyle Young
as 21-1180
Respondent:
Department of Justice, United States Attorney General and United States
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Barnes v. 309 Rte 100 Dover LLC
as 20-4093
Appellee:
NEC Financial Services, LLC, LPV, 15-Hermitage, LLC, Vermont Department of Taxes and others
Appellant:
James R. Barnes, Creditor and Equity Holder
Kastner v. Tri State Eye
as 20-3671
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph R.E. Kastner
Defendant:
Third Party CIGNA, United States of America, All Represented by the US Attorney through the US Food & Drug Administration, USA et al. through the EEOC, through the "SSAUSA" et al.The US Inspector General,USA et al., United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Tri State Eye, et al., Crystal Run Healthcare, Coverys RFG, Inc., is serviced by ProSelect Insurance Company, CRHC REP #1 Mr. Douglas Sansted(Esq. Not LLP) CRHC Rep. #2 Kristen Larson Doyle(Esq Not LLP) Jeffrey Feldman Doyle(Esq not LLP) are all reps of FKC&S CRHC exclusiv, Feldman, Kleidman, Coffey & Sappe, Attorneys at Law FKC&S Rep #1 Kristen Larsen Doyle (Esq Not LLP) are all Reps of FKC&S CRHC Exclusively Esqs. and others
Plaintiff:
Jane and John Doe 1-20, Personal Injury / Pain Suffering, Emotional Physical Psychological Distress Litigation, and Lost Income of 32 Years Past, Present and Future, Civil Rights, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury, Civil Rights with High Prejudice
Turane v. The State of New York
as 20-2244
Defendant / Appellee:
Melissa Davis, Administrative Law Judge, Board of Parole, New York State DOCCS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trumaine Turane
Turane v. The State of New York
as 20-1499
Defendant / Appellee:
Melissa Davis, Administrative Law Judge, Brigitte Fortune, Adminstrative Law Judge, New York State DOCCS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Trumaine Turane
In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Re
as 20-1212
Claimant:
Estate of Laura E. Johnson, Estate of Brian McVeigh, Jonica L. Woody and others
Defendant:
All Right, Title And Interest In 4836 Marconi Avenue, All right, title and interest in the real property and appurtenances located at 4836 Marconi Avenue, Carmichael, California 95608, with all improvements and attachments thereon, All Right Title And Interest In 55-11 Queens Boulevard, All right, title and interest in the real property and appurtenances located at 55-11 Queens Boulevard, Queens, New York 11377, Block 1325 Lots 1,6,7 and 8 with all improvements and attachments, Bank Melli Iran in 650 Fifth Avenue Company, including but not limited to the Real Estate Property and Appurtenances located at 650 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, with all improvements and attachments thereon and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tzvi Rozenman, Jenny Rubin, United States of America and others
Appellee:
Richard W. Wood
Plaintiff:
Renay Frym, Abraham Mendelson and Stuart E. Hersh
Trustee:
Kathleen A. Roberts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
