Cases 41 - 50 of 557
Perez Tapia v. Garland
as 22-6230
Petitioner:
MANUEL BOLIVAR PEREZ TAPIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. White (Howard)
as 22-2038
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael White, AKA Mike, Joey Colon, Demetrius Wingo, AKA Poppa and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Howard, AKA JuJu
Perez Fuentes v. Garland
as 22-6578
Petitioner:
NOE ORLANDO PEREZ FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Vasquez (Wilkin De Los Santos)
as 22-3164
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gerald Vasquez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Gary Bierd, AKA Gary Bird, AKA V.O., Irvin Castillo, AKA Mune and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Wilkin De Los Santos
Li v. Connecticut
as 22-2863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dongmei Li
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Connecticut, Dept of Public Health, Connecticut, Dept of Mental Health & Addiction Svcs, Connecticut and others
Perez-Garcia v. Garland
as 22-6295
Petitioner:
SAMUEL PEREZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. White (Howard)
as 22-3079
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael White, AKA Mike, Joey Colon, Demetrius Wingo, AKA Poppa and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Howard, AKA JuJu
Perez v. Garland
as 22-6454
Petitioner:
MARIA REINA PEREZ and CHRISTIAN ALESSANDRO SALVADOR-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. Jones
as 22-2713
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
Janice Jones, Jacqueline Mackey and Anthony Annucci
United States of America v. Quiros (Orlando Quiros)
as 22-2901
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leonel Quiros, AKA Haze, Corey Best, Lisette Perez and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Orlando Quiros, AKA O, AKA Gordo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
