Cases 1 - 10 of 214
United States of America v. Floy (Edwards)
as 24-1547
Defendant:
JAUWAN EDWARDS, LUIS GARCIA, HENRY FLOY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Warren
as 24-1538
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LAQUAN WARREN
Lau v. NYSARC Trust Services, Inc.
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
GILBERT LAU
Defendant:
DOROTHY ZYSKOWSKI, Director of Trusts, JAMIE HARLA, Team Leader-Trust Administrator, NYSARC TRUST SERVICES, INC. and others
Primous v. United States Attorney General James
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
HAZEL PRIMOUS
Defendant:
JAMES KENNEDY, JR., TRINI E. ROSS, ERIC HOLDER and others
Warren v. Ebay, Inc.
as 24-386
Defendant:
OLDBOOMBOX, Seller on Ebay, EBAY, INC., JAMIE LANNONE, Pres./CEO of Ebay and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WARREN
United States of America v. Washington (Alexander)
as 24-161
Defendant:
SHELLY WASHINGTON and Sealed Defendant 1
Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN ALEXANDER and Seven
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Doe v. Baram
as 23-1192
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Jonathan Baram
Defendant / Appellant:
Warren & Baram Management LLC
Wynn v. Warren
as 23-942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Lytle, LLP, Esq. Richard Evans, Cheswold (TL) LLC and others
Defendant:
Judge Paul R. Warren, Judge Thomas E. Moran and Judge Sam L. Valleriani
Wynn v. Larimer
as 23-949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James I. Wynn, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillips Lytle LLP, Kevin Hogan, John F. Speranza and others
Defendant:
Judge David G. Larimer and Judge Paul R. Warren
Thompson v. The City of New York
as 23-900
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Thompson
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Police Officer Pagiel Clark, Shield #28472, Police Officer Paul Montefusco, Shield# 10580 and others
Defendant:
Police Officers John and Jane Does 1-10, Police Officer Warren Rodney, Shield # 13744 and Sergeant Anthony Bertram, Shield #277
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
