Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Idlibi v. Connecticut Department of Public Health
as 24-720
Plaintiff:
AMMAR IDLIBI
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, CONNECTICUT STATE DENTAL COMMISSION, DAVID TILLES, in their official and personal capacities and others
Hubert v. Department of Corrections
as 24-275
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARONE HUBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT and CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ambrose v. Mulligan
as 23-7173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK AMBROSE
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. SYED J. NAQVI, Utilization Review Committee (URC), MONICA FARINELLI, Utilization Review Committee (URC), RICARDO RUIZ, Utilization Review Committee (URC) and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM MULLIGAN, Connecticut State Correctional Facility Warden
P.J. v. Connecticut State Board of Education
as 23-861
Plaintiff / Appellee:
L.G., By & Through Her Parents & Next Friends Mr. & Mrs. L.G., M.L., By & Through Parents & Next Friends Mr. & Mrs. J.L, Ian Ian Katz, by and through his parents and next friends Mr. and Mrs. Mark Katz and others
Defendant:
West Hartford Board of Education, Windham Board of Education, Stamford Board of Education and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Connecticut State Board of Education and Commissioner Gerald Tirozzi, Connecticut Department of Education
Bellatoni v. Lamont
as 23-656
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James N. Bellatoni, Jr., Gina Reichert, Bette Kitik and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Edward Lamont, Governor of the State of Connecticut, in both his official and personal capacities and Manisha Juthani, Connecticut State Public Health Commissioner, in her official capacity
Pilat v. Amedisys, Inc.
as 23-566
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Pilat, Relator, United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, State o and Philip Maniscalco, Relator, United States of America, State of California, State of Colorado, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Florida, State of Georgia, State of Illinois, State of Indiana, State of Louisiana, State of Maryland, Sta
Defendant / Appellee:
Amadisys, Inc., Does 1-100 and Amedisys, Inc.
Doe v. East Lyme Board of Education
as 23-171
Plaintiff:
John Doe, by and through his parent Jane Doe
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
East Lyme Board of Education
Defendant:
Connecticut State Department of Education
Petitioner:
Kotin, Crabtree & Strong, LLP
Doe v. East Lyme Board of Education
as 22-1504
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jane Doe and John Doe, by and through his parent Jane Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
East Lyme Board of Education
Defendant:
Connecticut State Department of Education
Gawlik v. Semple
as 22-1423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jan M. Gawlik
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Semple, COM'R, Sued in their Individual and Official Capacities/Dept. of Corrections Personnel, Scott Erfe, Warden, Sued in their Individual and Official Capacities/Dept. of Corrections Personnel, Czeremcha, Lieutenant, Sued in their Individual and Official Capacities/Dept. of Corrections Personnel and others
Defendant:
Chaniece Parker, Nurse, Sued in their Individual and Official Capacities/Dept. of Corrections Personnel, John B. Ceruti, State Trooper Lieutenant, Badge #044, Internal Affairs Unit, Sued in their Individual and Official Capacities/Connecticut State Police (DESPP), Edmund Vayan, State Trooper, Detective, Badge #1182, Division of Major Crimes, Sued in their Individual and Official Capacities/Connecticut State Police (DESPP) and others
Roundtree v. Lemont
as 22-1003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anjaknie Roundtree
Defendant / Appellee:
Ned Lemont, Governor of Connecticut/State Capitol, Catherine Vera, Department of Children and Families and Nichole Stewart, Department of Children and Families
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
