Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stegemann v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Of
as 22-205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua G. Stegemann
Defendant / Appellee:
Arthur Hyde, AKA Art Hyde, Shane Holcomb, Mark Geracitano and others
Defendant:
Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office, Rensselaer County, Rensselaer County District Attorney's Office and others
Datta v. DEA Agents
as 21-1960
Petitioner:
Vikram Datta
Respondent:
DEA Agents, IRS Agents, Magistrate Judges and others
Acevedo et al v. Capra
as 21-1822
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Bowman, Corneal Cordon, Bruce Bryant and others
Petitioner:
Samuel Acevedo
Respondent / Appellee:
Michael Capra, Superintendent, Sing Sing Correctional Facility
Stegemann v. Rensselaer County Sheriff's Of
as 20-3316
Defendant:
Rensselaer County, Rensselaer County Sheriff's Office, Thomas Bowler and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Subsurface Informational Surveys, Inc., Michael Fynn, New York State Police Sort and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joshua G. Stegemann
Deas v. United States of America
as 18-2011
Petitioner:
Vida Deas
Respondent:
United States of America
Rivera v. Samilo
as 18-1312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joahan Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
DEA Special Agent David T. Samilo, DEA Special Agent Edward Tracy, DEA Special Agent Joseph Doherty and others
United States of America v. Torres (Deas)
as 18-1039
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruben Torres, AKA Rube, AKA "T", AKA Ru, Antwane Williams-Bey, AKA Buck, Michael Chapman, AKA Nice, AKA Mizzo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Willie Deas
Chunn v. Amtrak
as 17-3617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Chunn
Defendant - Appellee:
Amtrak, P.O. Coleman and P.O. Looney
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Agency, Colon, Supervising John Doe, Agent and others
Deas v. United States of America
as 17-1909
Petitioner:
Vida Deas
Respondent:
United States of America
Deas v. United States of America
as 17-1684
Petitioner:
Vida Deas
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
