Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 22-275
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor:
James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Ferguson v. Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb Inc.
as 21-3066
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat and Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., George L. Argyros, Tim Bahr and others
Intervenor:
James DuCharme, Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz and others
Canfield v. Ferguson
as 21-2110
Petitioner:
Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz, Latrecia Onunkwor and others
Respondent:
Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat, Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and others
DuCharme v. Ferguson
as 21-2102
Petitioner:
James DuCharme, et al.
Respondent:
Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat, Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maye v. State of New York
as 11-4636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyrone Maye
Defendant - Appellee:
State of New York, Joseph W. Bethel, in his official capacity, Paul R. Frettoloso, Detective Sargeant, shield number 052, serial number 3321, in his official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
