Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Freeman v. Sansom
as 24-668
Plaintiff:
LISA FREEMAN
Defendant:
SCOTT SANSOM, Chief of Police, JOSEPH FICACELLI, Police Lieutenant and TOWN OF EAST HARTFORD
Ramos v. Town of East Hartford
as 19-3541
Defendant / Appellee:
James Lis, Sergeant, Jason Kaplan, Officer, Town of East Hartford and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wilson Ramos, As Administrator of the Estate of Jose A. Maldonado, and individually
Ramos v. East Hartford
as 19-2197
Defendant / Appellant:
Jason Cohen, Officer and James Lis, Sergeant
Defendant:
Jason Kaplan, Officer, Scott M. Sansom, Chief of the East Hartford Police Department and Town of East Hartford
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wilson Ramos, As Administrator of the Estate of Jose A. Maldonado, and individually
Huaman v. Sirois
as 17-3549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Karla Huaman, on behalf of J.M.
Defendant - Appellee:
Woodrow Tinsley, III, Police Officer, In His Individual and Official Capacity
Defendant:
Mark Sirois, Chief of Police, In His Individual and Official Capacity, Steven Syme, Police Sergeant, In His Individual and Official Capacity, Kenneth Sullivan, Police Officer, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Huaman v. Sirois
as 17-3420
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Karla Huaman, on behalf of J.M.
Defendant:
Mark Sirois, Chief of Police, In His Individual and Official Capacity, Steven Syme, Police Sergeant, In His Individual and Official Capacity, Kenneth Sullivan, Police Officer, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Woodrow Tinsley, III, Police Officer, In His Individual and Official Capacity
Ace Partners, LLC v. Town of East Hartford
as 14-3831
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ace Partners, LLC, DBA TC's Pawn Company
Defendant - Appellant:
Town of East Hartford, East Hartford Police Department, Mark J. Sirois, Chief of Police, I/O and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
