Cases 101 - 110 of 5,812
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Chowaniec v. Whitesboro Police Dept et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J. Chowaniec
Defendant:
Whitesboro Police Dept and Brandon Macera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bowen
Defendant:
Thomas Gordon, Arthur G. Dun, Denise M. Resta-Tobin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. European Central Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
European Central Bank, Christine Legarde and Luis de Guindos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Central Bank of West African States
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Central Bank of West African States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamil Abdul Muhammad v. Eastern Caribbean Central Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Eastern Caribbean Central Bank, Senator Samuel C. Dir, ACCA and Raquel Leonce C. Dir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Bank of Central African States
as 3:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdul Muhammad
Defendant:
Bank of Central African States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
