Cases 11 - 20 of 346
Sloley v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Maxmillian Sloley and BX
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Correction Officer Joyce, P.A. Milov and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bemiss v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01249
Petitioner:
Daniel Bemiss
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv01211
Petitioner:
Gary H. Moore
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hardee v. Thomas et al
as 9:2023cv01142
Plaintiff:
Stanley Hardee
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Thomas, Superintendent Correctional Officer John Doe 1 and Superintendent Correctional Officer John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00908
Petitioner:
Naaron Dunbar
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
Storm Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
Alexander Holmes
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00863
Petitioner:
Craig Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levesque v. Auburn Correctional Facility, et al
as 9:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Auburn Correctional Facility, Superintendant Joseph Corey, DSA Nupoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00612
Petitioner:
Khari Devon Coley
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
