Cases 81 - 90 of 414
Dixon v. The City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2020cv00381
Defendant:
Police Officer Leonard Brown, Former Police Officer Ahmad Mims, Police Officer Vogel and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Moss v. Evans et al
as 9:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Lawrence R. Brown, Gregory A. Smith, Daniel E. Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown & Weinraub, PLLC v. Bolt Mobility Corporation
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Bolt Mobility Corporation
Plaintiff:
Brown & Weinraub, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Berry v. Attorney General of The State of New York et al
as 9:2019cv01570
Defendant:
Inspector General of State of New York, Lt. Lord, Superintendent/Warden of Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dent v. Layo et al
as 9:2019cv01546
Defendant:
D. Brown, Layo, C.R. Tremblay and others
Plaintiff:
Tyran Dent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Rich
as 9:2019cv01525
Petitioner:
Mark Brown
Respondent:
John G. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Brown et al
as 9:2019cv01476
Defendant:
James Canning, Matthew Lafountain, Bradley Breeman and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Knapp et al
as 3:2019cv01338
Defendant:
LeAnne Knapp, XYZ Corporation, LeAnne M. Knapp and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Brown v. Bell
as 9:2019cv01295
Petitioner:
Kilroy Brown
Respondent:
E. Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
