Cases 81 - 90 of 32,406
Green v. Aoun et al
as 9:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Darnell Green
Defendant:
Aoun and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Cook et al
as 9:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ransom
Defendant:
Ms. Cook, Ms. Harrigan, Mr. Rushford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheehan v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Billy Michael Sheehan
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Calabria v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00622
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hope Calabria
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. Sheriff
as 9:2024cv00618
Petitioner:
Keith Rodriguez
Respondent:
Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earl v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
David R. Earl
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hilts v. Ellis Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jaheem R. Hilts
Defendant:
Ellis Hospital, A Nurse and Shantanu Baghel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chennells v. Curran et al
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Chennells
Defendant:
Michael J. Curran, Edward Haynes, Will Devin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Story v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Story
Defendant:
Federal Beureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
