Cases 11 - 20 of 13,549
Caldwell v. Schemmel et al
as 1:2024cv03475
Plaintiff:
Whitt Caldwell
Defendant:
Michael Schemmel and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wesolek v. Erie County Holding Center et al
as 1:2024cv03521
Plaintiff:
Justin Wesolek
Defendant:
Erie County Holding Center, Eric County Sheriff Department, Kathy Hochul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Frisina et al
as 1:2024cv03558
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
D. Frisina, S. Jackson, Phil Melecio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. v. Sika AG et al
as 1:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp
Defendant:
Sika AG, Sika Corporation, Chryso, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 sc Sherman-Clayton Act
Williams Assets, LLC et al v. Garvey et al
as 1:2024cv03234
Plaintiff:
Williams Assets, LLC and Altenor, LLC
Defendant:
Patrick Garvey, Deutsche Bank National Trust, Turnover, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Bates v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bates
Defendant:
City Of New York, Dylan Gilliam and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv03218
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv03219
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings,LLC v. Doe
as 7:2024cv03215
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings,LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
