Cases 51 - 60 of 631
Evans v. Juste
as 1:2022cv09765
Plaintiff:
James Earl Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. D. Juste and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Juste et al
as 7:2022cv09767
Plaintiff:
James Earl Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
Doctor D. Juste, Orange County Jail Dentist and Jane Doe, Hygenist
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Orange County Jail Dental Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv09768
Plaintiff:
James Earl Evans, Sr.
Defendant:
Orange County Jail Dental Dept. and Jon Doe (Dental Doctor)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09414
Plaintiff:
Sanders Walter, II
Defendant:
Antony John Blinken, Janet Louise Yellen, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dreamtex, Inc. et al v. Alva Advance, LLC
as 1:2022cv09248
Petitioner:
Dreamtex, Inc. and Evan Young
Respondent:
Alva Advance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
GTFM, Inc. et al v. For Us By Us Network et al
as 1:2022cv09099
Plaintiff:
GTFM, Inc. and GTFM, LLC
Defendant:
For Us By Us Network, For Us By Us, LLC, J. Alexander Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Riley v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08983
Plaintiff:
Sean Riley
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Jenkins v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv08871
Plaintiff:
Shannon Jenkins
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Concepcion v. 3rd Avenue Heights LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07959
Plaintiff:
Jose Concepcion
Defendant:
3rd Avenue Heights LLC, Evan Roberts Company, Fordham 26 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stein v. Hill International, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07907
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Hill International, Inc., David Sgro, Raouf S. Ghali and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
