Cases 41 - 50 of 831,607
Precise Solutions LLC dba Eurotech Elite v. Truist Bank fka Suntrust Bank
as 8:2024cv01551
Plaintiff:
Precise Solutions LLC dba Eurotech Elite
Defendant:
Truist Bank fka Suntrust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Dunlap v. McFarlene
as 1:2024cv02835
Petitioner:
Jr. Robert Dunlap
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlton v. Wrozier et al
as 1:2024cv01881
Plaintiff:
Lewis Alan Carlton
Defendant:
KK Wrozier, City of Smyrna GA, Smyrna Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bido v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Benny Bido
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Morris v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rachel Morris
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity of citizenship
Kim v. USA
as 1:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Max Kim
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Banks v. Jeffreys et al
as 2:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Michael S Banks
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Wexford Health Sources Inc, LaToya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
