Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 398
In Re Mexican Government Bonds Antitrust Litigatio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W., on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Banco Santander, S.A., Santander Investment Securities Inc., Santander Holdings USA, Inc. and others
Defendant: John Does 1-10
IN RE MEXICAN GOVERNMENT BONDS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02830
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Firefighters Pension & Retirement System and Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103, I.B.E.W.
Consolidated Plaintiff: Boston Retirement System, United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund, Government Employees' Retirement System of the Virgin Islands and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Omanoff v. Reifler et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv05827
Plaintiff: Rodney Omanoff
Defendant: Bradley Carl Reifler, Lisette Lou Ackerberg, Nancy Reifler and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Talking Capital Windup LLC f/k/a Talking Capital LLC, Kelcop Family LLC a/k/a Kelcop LLC, Bradley Reifler, Nancy Reifler, Lisette Ackerberg and/or John Does 1 and 2, as Trustees of Ackerberg Irrevocable Trust FBO Kesley Reifler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ri Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Swayze v. Lafontant
as 22-1554
Plaintiff / Appellee: Scott Swayze
Defendant: Theresa Lafontant, Police Officers John Does 1-10, said names being fictitious and unknown and ABC Company 1-10, said names being fictitious and unknown
Defendant / Appellant: Natasha Lafontant
Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd.
as 20-3775
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase & Co., HSBC Holdings PLC, Lloyds Banking Group PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jeffrey Laydon, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Societe Generale, Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A. and Barclays Bank PLC
Intervenor: California State Teachers' Retirement System
Plaintiff: Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Stephen P. Sullivan
Cook v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03283
Plaintiff: Elizabeth A. Cook
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Apex Medical, P.C. et al
as 1:2021cv05921
Plaintiff: Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant: Apex Medical, P.C., Arkam Rehman, M.D., John Doe Defendants "1" - "10" and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cayuga Nation v. Parker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00128
Plaintiff: Cayuga Nation
Defendant: Dustin Parker, Nora Weber, Jose Verdugo, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Khan et al v. Conzo et al
as 1:2022cv00366
Plaintiff: Aysha Khan and Nzone Pharmacy, LLC doing business as Elite Pharmacy
Defendant: Thomas Conzo, Jose Solano, Frier and Levitt LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Cayuga Nation v. Parker et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff: Cayuga Nation
Defendant: Dustin Parker, Nora Weber, Jose Verdugo, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?