Cases 101 - 110 of 63,352
Morinville v. Dukes et al
as 9:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Carlos Morinville
Defendant:
Upstate Correctional Facility, T. Dukes, B. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenney v. King
as 9:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Erik G. Kenney
Respondent:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Heshimu Barker
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurley v. Stover
as 3:2024cv00593
Petitioner:
Ashley Hurley
Respondent:
R. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abellard v. M.J. King
as 1:2024cv03719
Plaintiff:
Euzebelin Abellards
Defendant:
M.J. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torres v. Titus
as 6:2024cv06318
Petitioner:
Jose L. Torres
Respondent:
Superintendent A. Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06321
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Todd K. Baxter, Matt Vanduzee, Hon. James E. Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ames et al v. Sexton et al
as 3:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Mary Ames and Brianna Triplett
Defendant:
Trina Sexton, Michael Beaton, Tzar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santoro v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
John N. Santoro, Jr.
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Timothy D. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
