Cases 111 - 120 of 1,444
Blaize v. Lumsden-Lynch et al
as 1:2022cv05028
Plaintiff:
Sharon Blaize
Defendant:
Denyse Lumsden-Lynch, Carline Centis and Raynette Baptiste Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Raleigh v. Baribault et al
as 3:2022cv01069
Plaintiff:
Kyle Raleigh and Kyle S Raleigh
Defendant:
Donna M Baribault and Michael P Durvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Bristol et al v. Town of Camden et al
as 6:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Todd Bristol, Kimberly Bristol and Sugar Shack's Water Inc.
Defendant:
Town of Camden, Town of Camden Planning Board, Town of Camden Town Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Franco III v. Roger Smith, et al
as 2:2022cv04674
Plaintiff:
Vincent Franco III
Defendant:
Village of Amityville, New York, Roger Smith, Richard Ubert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Inc. et al v. 82 Highview LLC et al
as 7:2022cv06579
Plaintiff:
Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim Inc. and 82 Highview LLC
Defendant:
Shem Olam LLC, Rabbi Aryeh Zaks and Aryeh Zaks
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Balash-Ioannidou v. Contour Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv04506
Plaintiff:
Anna T. Balash-Ioannidou
Defendant:
Contour Mortgage Corporation and Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB
Balash-Ioannidou v. Contour Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Anna T. Balash-Ioannidou
Defendant:
Contour Mortgage Corporation and LoanCare, LLC
Balash-Ioannidou v. Contour Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv06242
Plaintiff:
Anna T. Balash-Ioannidou
Defendant:
Contour Mortgage Corporation and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rp Diversity-Real Property
Friedman v. Univest National Bank and Trust Co.
as 1:2022cv03858
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Friedman
Defendant:
Univest National Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
